And you can charm the critics and have nothin' to eat"
-Donald O'Connor Singing in the Rain
Last night I watched Nora Ephron’s You've Got Mail and I absolutely loved it. Romantic Comedies can no longer be guilty pleasures for me, I unabashedly love them. Consequently, the “romcom” as it is and always will be is a critically derided genre. These are not Films, they’re Movies. Don’t expect heavy philosophical or moral themes you would find in a Bergman or Coppola film. Instead relish the escapism and social commentary on dating and falling in love. While I was watching the movie last night I realized that this was the kind of movie I actually really want to make, and I am heading in that direction. About a week ago I started developing a romantic comedy screenplay that will be as escapist as can be. But realizing that I’m beginning my career with a romcom, I also realize that the “artist” side of myself who thrived in college is quickly fading away.
I’ll admit right now that I’m pretentious and snobby. I try not to be, but I just can’t help it sometimes. But I think since I’ve graduated from college I’ve gotten much better. It’s very easy to become a pretentious ass when you’re in college. You spend the majority of your time buried in a book and then spend class time arguing about Joyce or Faulkner. Then you go home and you argue with your roommate about Coppola and Scorses. And I was spoiled during my college career because I never had a job so all of my bills were paid by my parents (THANKS!) When there are no bills to pay and you’re surrounded by academically obsessed individuals, all your time is devoted to being the smartest one in the room.
In college I studied the film industry historically, critically, and from afar. I saw the sins of studios and success of individuals. As I was learning, the best films were created by the mavericks who rebelled against the studios, the corporations, nay! The Man. I thought, even I, the lowly Ryan Graves can make a great Film that will be revered by all! A film that will stand the test of time. I won’t give into the studio’s demands, what do they know? After all, I’m the artist! But then I graduated, and I realized them bills needs to get paid!
![]() |
| You read That!? |
Now that I work and live in Portland, I just don’t have the time to live like a student. I can’t spend hours reading Joyce or Forster or Austen. I need to read the books for my internship as a reader. I need to read the books that are popular so I can understand the entertainment landscape. I need to watch the movies that work; the TV shows that work, in order to understand what products would succeed in the film and television market. My entertainment diet still has a handful of Hitchcocks and Woody Allens, but they come after “The Hunger Games” and “The Middle” (Which are both really good! Honestly, check ‘em out!) In college I would always scoff at people reading or watching things that lay in the “Low Art” territory. Now low and middle art is where I live, work, and play.
As a reader for a NYC based Production Company, I’ve been reading a lot of bad books. But I learned very quickly that a bad book doesn’t mean it won’t make any money. Even if a book is poorly written, I can still see a TV show or film, so I pass it on to my boss for consideration. My college self would be horrified that I forgive certain writers for seriously bad stories, but the me of today realizes that this company needs to thrive, and very few companies can make purely artistic products. Not to say that the company I intern for is a sell-out. I’m just saying that a company has to make a profit, and if it’s in the red, it will not last.
I’ve been studying the TV landscape, looking at shows that work, trends that pop up. I make my decision to adapt a show on whether or not it’s likeable by an audience, not the greatest story that can be told. The great artists whom I revere never seemed to have cared too much about audience expectation. James Joyce’s last book is almost incomprehensible, Terrence Malick’s latest film, Tree of Life floored me, but sent many audience members literally running. Romantic comedy filmmakers are intelligent and skilled but aren’t as indulgent as high artists. I’m sure Nora Ephron doesn’t see herself as Charlotte Bronte or Jane Austen. She’s a filmmaker who wants to make entertaining movies, and most of the time she accomplishes that. And I realized that I won’t be James Joyce or Terrence Malick. I want to make movies that people will enjoy. I’ve accepted that I won’t be an artist. I’m going to be a filmmaker, who will tell a great story as well as I can. And if I can make an audience think for just a bit about whatever the movie’s about, then I’ve done my job.
Now I just need to shut up and just write the damn screenplay.


